Monday, October 29, 2012

The case against Chris Krych, the state wasting money on prosecution, while double bunking to save money


I have been running the Chris Krych personal/ legal blog on his behalf for about 2 years now, and now there is a new blog that will be specifically for the legal work of Mr. Krych and his new TAP group. The new address is here:

In the initial entry, Mr. Krych gives us the tale of his two pending criminal cases from 2011. Krych has been a staunch opponent of double bunking at Moose Lake since he was twice assaulted by a cellmate. He was told the only way he would get a room to himself was to get a write-up. So he broke windows on two separate occasions. But instead of a mere disciplinary, Krych was charged in real criminal court with destruction of property. Mr. Krych argues he was entrapped.

Thus, he is asking you, the reader, to judge his case. I'd like to point out that after each incident, Mr. Krych cooperated with staff and did not resist. He even neatly packed his meager belongings in anticipation of his move.

Also, of interesting note is the condition of the civil commitment center. The evidence files give us a rare look inside Moose Lake Civil Commitment Center. Is it really a treatment center or a prison? You be the judge.

In my opinion, it seems odd to spend money prosecuting this case while double-bunking to save money. Hm.

First up, the testimony from Mr. Krych himself as to why he smashed the windows in the first place:





___________________________________________________

The first of the two incidents is on Oct. 6, 2011.

Below is a link to the incident report for the first instance:

http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/4925819/krychoct11case-pdf-3-9-meg?da=y

Here is a Youtube video of the first incident:



Here are a few pictures taken as evidence:








___________________________________________________

The second of the two incidents is on Nov. 2, 2011


Below is a link to the incident report for the second instance:

http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/4925822/krychnov11case-pdf-3-9-meg?da=y

Here is a Youtube video of the second incident:



Here are a few pictures taken as evidence:



Act of violence? 
OR Entrapment? 
YOU BE THE JUDGE!

1 comment:

  1. Entrapment. Outrageous Government Conduct. Violations of 4th, 8th, & 14th Amendments. Chris, you pleas are being heard loud and clear and are being actively investigated by several news agencies.

    Legal help is on the way Chris. Hang in there!

    ReplyDelete